Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-1620

Compare Intel Xeon E3 v3 Family 4 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 Family 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-1620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 99.00

$ 54.08 significantly less expensive

$ 153.08

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2307 points

2735 points

18% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4249 points

4274 points

0.59% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1762 points

2280 points

29% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1691 points

2192 points

29% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E3-1226 v3 and the Xeon E5-1620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

45.99 points

12% slightly higher Blender score

40.70 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

2832 points

23% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

2284 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

871 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

592 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3291 points

46% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

2244 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1157 points

89% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

611 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.3 GHz

3.6 GHz

9% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.7 GHz

3.8 GHz

2% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

84 W

54% significantly lower TDP

130 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

32 GiB

375 GiB

1071% significantly more supported memory

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

658th of 1,089

582nd of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E3 v3 Family

Xeon E5 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 May

2012 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1333

DDR3-1066

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E3-1226 v3 vs Xeon E5-1620 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-1620 performs better than the Xeon E3-1226 v3. Despite this, the Xeon E3-1226 v3 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

Our spec comparison shows that they have an identical amount of cores but the Xeon E5-1620 has more threads. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E3-1226 v3. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E3-1226 v3 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-1620 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Xeon E3-1226 v3 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.