Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 comparison
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X performs better than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2640 v3 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has significantly more cores than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 16 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Xeon E5-2640 v3. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a slightly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 outputs less heat than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.