AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Core i5-10400F

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-10400F comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is faster than the Core i5-10400F. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i5-10400F in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has significantly more cores with 12 cores whereas the Core i5-10400F has 6 cores. It also has more threads than the Core i5-10400F. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a slightly higher clock speed than the Core i5-10400F. Despite this, the Core i5-10400F has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Core i5-10400F outputs less heat than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has significantly more L2 cache than the Core i5-10400F. The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X also has significantly more L3 cache.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.