Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 is faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Despite this, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 16 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. It also has more threads than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Our comparison shows that the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2698 v3. Also, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Xeon E5-2698 v3 outputs less heat than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X thanks to a slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.