AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs AMD EPYC 74F3

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs EPYC 74F3 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X beats the EPYC 74F3 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the EPYC 74F3 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the EPYC 74F3 has slightly more cores than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Indeed, the EPYC 74F3 has 9 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. It also has more threads than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a slightly higher clock speed than the EPYC 74F3. A Ryzen Threadripper 1900X CPU outputs less heat than a EPYC 74F3 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the EPYC 74F3 has slightly more L2 cache when compared to the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. The EPYC 74F3 also has significantly more L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.