AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 beats the Ryzen 9 4900HS in overall performance. Despite this, the Ryzen 9 4900HS has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 9 4900HS. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 16 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen 9 4900HS. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 9 4900HS. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 9 4900HS has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2698 v3. Also, the Ryzen 9 4900HS has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 9 4900HS CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2698 v3 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 9 4900HS has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.