AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs AMD FX-8350

Compare AMD Ryzen 9 Mobile 8 core CPU vs AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

5903 points

124% significantly better overall score

2626 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

7480 points

93% significantly better gaming score

3873 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

5373 points

141% significantly better multitasking score

2226 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

5224 points

144% significantly better heavy workload score

2136 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen 9 4900HS and the FX-8350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Physics score

Physics simulation benchmark

8249 points

516% significantly higher 3DMark Physics score

1338 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

138.57 points

198% significantly higher Blender score

46.35 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

6233 points

207% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

2027 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1440 points

192% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

493 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

6388 points

221% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

1989 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1452 points

197% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

488 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3 GHz

4 GHz

33% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4.3 GHz

2% slightly higher turbo speed

4.2 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

35 W

257% significantly lower TDP

125 W

L1 Cache

Smallest embedded memory, but the fastest

512 KiB

33% slightly more L1 cache

384 KiB

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

4 MiB

8 MiB

100% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

8 MiB

Identical

8 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

260th of 1,089

605th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Ryzen 9 Mobile

FX 8-Core Black Edition

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-3200

DDR3

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs FX-8350 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 9 4900HS performs better than the FX-8350. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-8350 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Ryzen 9 4900HS has significantly more cores with 8 cores compared to the FX-8350 that has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the FX-8350. Our comparison shows that the FX-8350 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 9 4900HS. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-8350 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 9 4900HS. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Ryzen 9 4900HS has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.