Ryzen 9 4900HS vs EPYC 74F3 benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is faster than the EPYC 74F3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the EPYC 74F3 in all gaming tests too.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the EPYC 74F3 has slightly more cores with 9 cores compared to the Ryzen 9 4900HS that has 8 cores. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 9 4900HS. Our comparison shows that the EPYC 74F3 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 9 4900HS. A Ryzen 9 4900HS CPU outputs less heat than a EPYC 74F3 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the EPYC 74F3 has slightly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 9 4900HS. The EPYC 74F3 also has significantly more L3 cache.
Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Ryzen 9 4900HS has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.