AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Core i9-10900

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i9-10900 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Core i9-10900 is faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 7 4800HS in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Core i9-10900 has slightly more cores than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. Indeed, the Core i9-10900 has 10 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen 7 4800HS. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 4800HS has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Core i9-10900. Despite this, the Core i9-10900 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 7 4800HS CPU outputs less heat than a Core i9-10900 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 4800HS has significantly more L2 cache than the Core i9-10900. Despite this, the Core i9-10900 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 7 4800HS.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 4800HS has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.