AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Intel Celeron G6900

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Celeron G6900 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is faster than the Celeron G6900. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Celeron G6900 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has significantly more cores with 4 cores compared to the Celeron G6900 that has 2 cores. It also has more threads than the Celeron G6900. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Celeron G6900. The Celeron G6900 outputs less heat than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G thanks to a slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the Celeron G6900 has more L2 cache than the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.