AMD Ryzen 5 5600H vs AMD FX-6300

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile 6 core CPU vs AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition 3 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

4862 points

170% significantly better overall score

1799 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

6603 points

120% significantly better gaming score

2999 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

4311 points

199% significantly better multitasking score

1441 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

4176 points

202% significantly better heavy workload score

1382 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen 5 5600H and the FX-6300? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Physics score

Physics simulation benchmark

4965 points

136% significantly higher 3DMark Physics score

2098 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

116.70 points

303% significantly higher Blender score

28.92 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5738 points

285% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

1489 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1625 points

244% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

472 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5695 points

299% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

1426 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1590 points

250% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

454 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.3 GHz

3.5 GHz

6% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4.2 GHz

10% slightly higher turbo speed

3.8 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

45 W

111% significantly lower TDP

95 W

L1 Cache

Smallest embedded memory, but the fastest

384 KiB

33% slightly more L1 cache

288 KiB

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

3 MiB

6 MiB

100% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

16 MiB

100% significantly more L3 cache

8 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

358th of 1,089

757th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Ryzen 5 Mobile

FX 6-Core Black Edition

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2021 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-3200

DDR3

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Ryzen 5 5600H vs FX-6300 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen 5 5600H is faster than the FX-6300. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-6300 in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the Ryzen 5 5600H has significantly more cores with 6 cores whereas the FX-6300 has 3 cores. It also has more threads than the FX-6300. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the FX-6300 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 5 5600H. The info from our database shows that the FX-6300 has more L2 cache than the Ryzen 5 5600H. Despite this, the Ryzen 5 5600H has significantly more L3 cache compared to the FX-6300.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 5600H has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.