AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs AMD FX-8320

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile 6 core CPU vs AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

4557 points

79% significantly better overall score

2534 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

6332 points

71% significantly better gaming score

3698 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

3995 points

85% significantly better multitasking score

2159 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

3865 points

86% significantly better heavy workload score

2072 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen 5 4600H and the FX-8320? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Physics score

Physics simulation benchmark

4367 points

53% significantly higher 3DMark Physics score

2853 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

105.84 points

178% significantly higher Blender score

37.97 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5212 points

187% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

1814 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1359 points

194% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

461 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5207 points

190% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

1791 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1385 points

202% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

458 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3 GHz

3.5 GHz

16% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4 GHz

Identical

4 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

45 W

177% significantly lower TDP

125 W

L1 Cache

Smallest embedded memory, but the fastest

384 KiB

Identical

384 KiB

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

3 MiB

8 MiB

166% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

8 MiB

Identical

8 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

385th of 1,089

620th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Ryzen 5 Mobile

FX 8-Core Black Edition

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-3200

DDR3

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes

Ryzen 5 4600H vs FX-8320 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 5 4600H performs better than the FX-8320. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-8320 in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the Ryzen 5 4600H has significantly more cores with 6 cores whereas the FX-8320 has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the FX-8320. Our comparison shows that the FX-8320 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 5 4600H. A Ryzen 5 4600H CPU outputs less heat than a FX-8320 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-8320 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Ryzen 5 4600H. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 4600H has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.