Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-9900K benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Core i9-9900K is faster than the Ryzen 5 2600. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 5 2600 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Core i9-9900K has slightly more cores than the Ryzen 5 2600. Indeed, the Core i9-9900K has 8 cores compared to 6 cores found in the Ryzen 5 2600. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 5 2600. With our hardware info, we find that the Core i9-9900K has a slightly higher clock speed than the Ryzen 5 2600. Also, the Core i9-9900K has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 5 2600 CPU outputs less heat than a Core i9-9900K CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 2600 has significantly more L2 cache than the Core i9-9900K. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 2600 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.