Ryzen 5 2500U vs FX-8350 specs and performance
In our benchmarks, the FX-8350 beats the Ryzen 5 2500U in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 5 2500U in all gaming tests too.
Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count and the same number of threads. Our comparison shows that the FX-8350 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 5 2500U. Also, the FX-8350 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 5 2500U CPU outputs less heat than a FX-8350 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-8350 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Ryzen 5 2500U. The FX-8350 also has significantly more L3 cache.
Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 2500U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.