AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD EPYC 74F3

Ryzen 5 1600 vs EPYC 74F3 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the EPYC 74F3 beats the Ryzen 5 1600 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 5 1600 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the EPYC 74F3 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 5 1600. Indeed, the EPYC 74F3 has 9 cores compared to 6 cores found in the Ryzen 5 1600. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 5 1600. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 1600 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the EPYC 74F3. A Ryzen 5 1600 CPU outputs less heat than a EPYC 74F3 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the EPYC 74F3 has more L2 cache than the Ryzen 5 1600. The EPYC 74F3 also has significantly more L3 cache.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 1600 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.