AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs AMD FX-6300

Compare AMD Ryzen 3 Mobile 2 core CPU vs AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition 3 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1528 points
1799 points
17% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2901 points
2999 points
3% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1156 points
1441 points
24% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1110 points
1382 points
24% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen 3 3250U and the FX-6300? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

18.95 points
28.92 points
52% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1400 points
1489 points
6% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

742 points
57% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
472 points
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1461 points
2% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
1426 points
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

752 points
65% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score
454 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

2
3
49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

4
6
49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
34% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
8% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

15 W
533% significantly lower TDP
95 W

L1 Cache

Smallest embedded memory, but the fastest

192 KiB
288 KiB
49% significantly more L1 cache

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

1 MiB
6 MiB
499% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

4 MiB
8 MiB
100% significantly more L3 cache

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

804th of 1,089
757th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Ryzen 3 Mobile
FX 6-Core Black Edition

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 June
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4
DDR3

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

No
No

Ryzen 3 3250U vs FX-6300 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the FX-6300 is faster than the Ryzen 3 3250U. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 3 3250U in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the FX-6300 has significantly more cores with 3 cores whereas the Ryzen 3 3250U has 2 cores. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 3 3250U. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-6300 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Ryzen 3 3250U. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-6300 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 3 3250U. The FX-6300 also has significantly more L3 cache.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 3250U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons