AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4

Compare AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics 4 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v4 Family 14 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 66.33

$ 145.62 significantly less expensive

$ 211.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2687 points

6066 points

125% significantly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4916 points

5717 points

16% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2058 points

6174 points

200% significantly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1975 points

6198 points

213% significantly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen 3 3200G and the Xeon E5-2680 v4? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

45.80 points

195.63 points

327% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

2944 points

6195 points

110% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1016 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

988 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3070 points

6901 points

124% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1075 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

1027 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

250% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

599% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.6 GHz

49% significantly higher clock speed

2.4 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4 GHz

21% slightly higher turbo speed

3.3 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

65 W

84% significantly lower TDP

120 W

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

593rd of 1,089

247th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Ryzen 3 Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics

Xeon E5 v4 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 July

2016 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4

DDR4-1600

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-2680 v4 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2680 v4 performs better than the Ryzen 3 3200G. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 3 3200G in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2680 v4 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 3 3200G. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 14 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Ryzen 3 3200G. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 3 3200G. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen 3 3200G has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2680 v4. Also, the Ryzen 3 3200G has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 3 3200G CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2680 v4 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Ryzen 3 3200G has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.