Ryzen 3 2200U vs FX-8320E comparison
In our benchmarks, the FX-8320E beats the Ryzen 3 2200U in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 3 2200U in all gaming tests too.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the FX-8320E has significantly more cores with 4 cores compared to the Ryzen 3 2200U that has 2 cores. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 3 2200U. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the FX-8320E has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 3 2200U. A Ryzen 3 2200U CPU outputs less heat than a FX-8320E CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-8320E has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Ryzen 3 2200U. The FX-8320E also has significantly more L3 cache.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 2200U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.