Ryzen 3 2200U vs FX-8150 specs and performance
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the FX-8150 performs better than the Ryzen 3 2200U. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 3 2200U in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the FX-8150 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 3 2200U. Indeed, the FX-8150 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Ryzen 3 2200U. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 3 2200U. Our comparison shows that the FX-8150 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Ryzen 3 2200U. A Ryzen 3 2200U CPU outputs less heat than a FX-8150 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-8150 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 3 2200U. The FX-8150 also has significantly more L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 2200U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.