Ryzen 3 2200U vs FX-6300 benchmarks
In our benchmarks, the FX-6300 beats the Ryzen 3 2200U in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 3 2200U in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the FX-6300 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 3 2200U. Indeed, the FX-6300 has 3 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Ryzen 3 2200U. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 3 2200U. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-6300 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Ryzen 3 2200U. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-6300 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 3 2200U. The FX-6300 also has significantly more L3 cache.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 2200U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.