Ryzen 3 1200 vs FX-6300 specs and performance
In our benchmarks, the Ryzen 3 1200 beats the FX-6300 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-6300 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Ryzen 3 1200 has slightly more cores than the FX-6300. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 1200 has 4 cores compared to 3 cores found in the FX-6300. Despite this, the FX-6300 has more threads than the Ryzen 3 1200. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-6300 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Ryzen 3 1200. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-6300 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 3 1200. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Ryzen 3 1200 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.