NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Compare NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

9309 points

79% significantly better overall score

5174 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

225 FPS

100 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

125 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

112 FPS

52 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

61 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

162 FPS

75 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

87 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

90 FPS

42 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

48 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the RTX A4500 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

4008.66 points

48% significantly higher Blender score

2703.17 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

142156 points

65% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

85961 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

131716 points

59% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

82701 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1050 MHz

1620 MHz

54% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1650 MHz

2130 MHz

29% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

320 Bit

150% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

640 GB/s

150% significantly higher memory bandwidth

256 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

200 W

70 W

185% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

158.4 Gigapixels/s

54% significantly higher pixel rate

102.2 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

369.6 Gigatexels/s

97% significantly higher texture rate

187.4 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

7168

154% significantly more shading units

2816

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

224

154% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

43rd of 586

99th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2021 November

2024 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

RTX A4500 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the RTX A4500 beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a significantly lower TDP at 70 W when compared to the RTX A4500 at 200 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the RTX A4500 is better than the RTX 2000 Ada Generation.