Radeon RX 560X vs Iris Plus comparison
For gaming, the Iris Plus graphics card is better than the Radeon RX 560X in our tests.
In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Iris Plus over the Radeon RX 560X.
AMD Radeon RX 560X vs Intel Iris Plus
Compare AMD Radeon RX 560X 4 GB vs Intel Iris Plus, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
GPU Comparison
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
Benchmark Score
Overall Score
General gaming and workstation score
1%
slightly better overall score
Flux Core frame rate
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
0 FPS
slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
Electron frame rate
Randomly generated noise sphere test
0 FPS
slightly higher Electron frame rate
City frame rate
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
2 FPS
slightly higher City frame rate
Clouds frame rate
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
Identical
Free GPU Benchmark
Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon RX 560X and the Iris Plus? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
Other Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
OpenCL compute benchmark
204%
significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Vulkan compute benchmark
150%
significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
OpenCL compute benchmark
179%
significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
Vulkan compute benchmark
131%
significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
Specifications
Other details
Rank
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
330th
of 586
329th
of 586
Family
The product line
Radeon RX 500X Series
-
Release date
The official date of release of this chip
2018 March
-
Memory Type
The type of memory used by this chip
GDDR5
-
DirectX Support
Maximum version of DirectX supported
12.0
-
OpenGL Support
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
4.6
-
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.