AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

816 points

62% significantly better overall score

501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

18 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

12 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

9 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

17 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

8 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon RX 460 and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21824 points

106% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

10557 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20340 points

97% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

10308 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

18277 points

80% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

10116 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

24052 points

148% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

9696 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1090 MHz

5% slightly higher core clock speed

1029 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1200 MHz

9% slightly higher boost clock speed

1098 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112 GB/s

39% slightly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

55 W

36% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.2 Gigapixels/s

9% slightly higher pixel rate

17.57 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.2 Gigatexels/s

53% significantly higher texture rate

43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

40% slightly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

278th of 586

328th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon RX 400 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August

2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Radeon RX 460 vs Quadro M2000M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Radeon RX 460 beats the Quadro M2000M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon RX 460 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Radeon RX 460 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Radeon RX 460 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Radeon RX 460 is faster than the Quadro M2000M.