AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

816 points

226% significantly better overall score

250 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

18 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

12 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

17 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon RX 460 and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

17920 points

776% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

2044 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21824 points

436% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20340 points

448% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3710 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

22320 points

501% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

3713 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

18277 points

348% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

24052 points

482% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4126 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1090 MHz

14% slightly higher core clock speed

954 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112 GB/s

75% significantly higher memory bandwidth

64 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

51 W

47% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.2 Gigapixels/s

151% significantly higher pixel rate

7.63 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.2 Gigatexels/s

120% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

133% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

276th of 586

400th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon RX 400 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Radeon RX 460 vs Quadro K2000 specs and performance

For gaming, the Radeon RX 460 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000 in our tests.

In our comparison, the Radeon RX 460 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Radeon RX 460 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Radeon RX 460 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Radeon RX 460 is faster than the Quadro K2000.