AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

816 points

388% significantly better overall score

167 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

18 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

12 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

17 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon RX 460 and the Quadro 2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21824 points

681% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2794 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

18277 points

432% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3434 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1090 MHz

98% significantly higher core clock speed

550 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112 GB/s

288% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

55 W

36% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.2 Gigapixels/s

336% significantly higher pixel rate

4.4 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.2 Gigatexels/s

281% significantly higher texture rate

17.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

366% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

277th of 586

459th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon RX 400 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Radeon RX 460 vs Quadro 2000M comparison

In our benchmarks, the Radeon RX 460 beats the Quadro 2000M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Radeon RX 460 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Radeon RX 460 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro 2000M has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Radeon RX 460 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon RX 460 over the Quadro 2000M.