AMD Radeon R9 390X vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Compare AMD Radeon R9 390X 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1474 points

1483 points

0.61% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

41 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

32 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

28 FPS

6 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

39 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

22 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

16 FPS

18 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 390X and the Quadro P2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4254 points

44% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

2953 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1050 MHz

1076 MHz

2% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1050 MHz

1480 MHz

40% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

512 Bit

220% significantly larger memory bus width

160 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

384 GB/s

173% significantly higher memory bandwidth

140.2 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

275 W

75 W

266% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

67.2 Gigapixels/s

13% slightly higher pixel rate

59.2 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

184.8 Gigatexels/s

95% significantly higher texture rate

94.72 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.91 TFLOPS

95% significantly better floating point performance

3.03 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2816

175% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

176

175% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

60% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

237th of 592

236th of 592

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Radeon R9 390X vs Quadro P2000 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P2000 beats the Radeon R9 390X in gaming performance.

The Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P2000 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon R9 390X at 275 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro P2000 is better than the Radeon R9 390X.