AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Compare AMD Radeon R9 390 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1919 points

176% significantly better overall score

695 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS

31 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

28 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

39 FPS

29 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 390 and the Quadro K2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

46328 points

285% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

12020 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49594 points

341% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

11238 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43704 points

281% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

11456 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

51251 points

407% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

10094 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

Identical

1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz

1124 MHz

12% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

512 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

384 GB/s

378% significantly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

275 W

68 W

304% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64 Gigapixels/s

255% significantly higher pixel rate

17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

160 Gigatexels/s

255% significantly higher texture rate

44.96 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2560

300% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

160

300% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

215th of 586

292nd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Radeon R9 390 vs Quadro K2200 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R9 390 beats the Quadro K2200 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that both the Radeon R9 390 and Quadro K2200 both have the same core clock speed. Despite this, the Quadro K2200 has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Radeon R9 390 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K2200 has a significantly lower TDP at 68 W when compared to the Radeon R9 390 at 275 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R9 390 over the Quadro K2200.