AMD Radeon R9 390 vs Intel Iris Xe

Compare AMD Radeon R9 390 8 GB vs Intel Iris Xe, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1919 points
97% significantly better overall score
974 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS
21 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
24 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

28 FPS
14 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
14 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

39 FPS
24 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
15 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS
5 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 390 and the Iris Xe? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3950 points
2237% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
169 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

46328 points
226% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
14184 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49594 points
251% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
14105 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43704 points
265% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
11957 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

51251 points
209% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
16575 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz
233% significantly higher core clock speed
300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz
1100 MHz
10% slightly higher boost clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

275 W
15 W
1733% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64 Gigapixels/s
384% significantly higher pixel rate
13.2 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

160 Gigatexels/s
506% significantly higher texture rate
26.4 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.12 TFLOPS
8.45 TFLOPS
64% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2560
566% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

160
566% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

64
433% significantly more render output processors
12

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

215th of 586
266th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 300 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June
2020 September

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
DDR4

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Radeon R9 390 vs Iris Xe specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R9 390 GPU is faster than the Iris Xe in gaming.

In our comparison, the Radeon R9 390 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Iris Xe has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Iris Xe has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Radeon R9 390 at 275 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 390 is better than the Iris Xe.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons