AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD Radeon RX 6500M

Compare AMD Radeon R9 280X 3 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6500M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1687 points
1956 points
15% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

40 FPS
59 FPS
19 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

25 FPS
40 FPS
15 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS
51 FPS
15 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS
23 FPS
9 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 280X and the Radeon RX 6500M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

850 MHz
2000 MHz
135% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz
2400 MHz
139% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB
4 GiB
33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit
499% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
125% significantly higher memory bandwidth
128 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

250 W
50 W
400% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

32 Gigapixels/s
76.8 Gigapixels/s
139% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128 Gigatexels/s
155.7 Gigatexels/s
21% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.10 TFLOPS
4.98 TFLOPS
21% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2048
100% significantly more shading units
1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

128
100% significantly more texture mapping units
64

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

226th of 586
212th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 200 Series
Radeon RX 6000 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2022 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon RX 6500M benchmarks

For gaming, the Radeon R9 280X graphics card is better than the Radeon RX 6500M in our tests.

Our database shows that the Radeon RX 6500M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Radeon RX 6500M also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Radeon RX 6500M has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Radeon RX 6500M has a significantly lower TDP at 50 W when compared to the Radeon R9 280X at 250 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R9 280X over the Radeon RX 6500M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons