AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Compare AMD Radeon R9 280X 3 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1687 points

2550 points

51% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

40 FPS

60 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

25 FPS

41 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS

51 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS

18 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 280X and the Radeon R9 Fury? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2350 points

4754 points

102% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Specifications

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz

Identical

1000 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB

4 GiB

33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit

4096 Bit

966% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

512 GB/s

77% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

250 W

10% slightly lower TDP

275 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

32 Gigapixels/s

64 Gigapixels/s

100% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128 Gigatexels/s

224 Gigatexels/s

75% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.10 TFLOPS

7.17 TFLOPS

75% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2048

3584

75% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

128

224

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

226th of 586

174th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 200 Series

Radeon R9 Fury Series

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 Fury specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R9 Fury beats the Radeon R9 280X in gaming performance.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Radeon R9 Fury has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Radeon R9 280X has a slightly lower TDP at 250 W when compared to the Radeon R9 Fury at 275 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 Fury is better than the Radeon R9 280X.