AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Compare AMD Radeon R9 270 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 987.00

$ 399.95

$ 587.05 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

807 points

1094 points

35% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

19 FPS

25 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

12 FPS

16 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

17 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

15 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

14 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 270 and the Quadro M3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22331 points

28% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

17348 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22701 points

37% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

16504 points

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

Identical

256 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

2 GB/s

160.4 GB/s

7919% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

150 W

75 W

100% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

29.6 Gigapixels/s

33.6 Gigapixels/s

13% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

74 Gigatexels/s

10% slightly higher texture rate

67.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.37 TFLOPS

10% slightly better floating point performance

2.15 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280

25% slightly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

280th of 586

257th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Radeon R9 270 vs Quadro M3000M comparison

For gaming, the Quadro M3000M graphics card is better than the Radeon R9 270 in our tests.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro M3000M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M3000M has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon R9 270 at 150 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M3000M over the Radeon R9 270.