AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Compare AMD Radeon R9 270 2 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

807 points
278% significantly better overall score
213 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

19 FPS
14 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

12 FPS
9 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

17 FPS
14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS
3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 270 and the GeForce MX110? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22331 points
383% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
4623 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22701 points
420% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
4362 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

900 MHz
978 MHz
8% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

925 MHz
1006 MHz
8% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
300% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

2 GB/s
40.1 GB/s
1904% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

150 W
30 W
400% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

29.6 Gigapixels/s
267% significantly higher pixel rate
8.05 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

74 Gigatexels/s
206% significantly higher texture rate
24.14 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280
233% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

80
233% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
300% significantly more render output processors
8

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

279th of 586
420th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 200 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2017 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce MX110 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R9 270 GPU is faster than the GeForce MX110 in gaming.

The GeForce MX110 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce MX110 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the GeForce MX110 has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Radeon R9 270 at 150 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 270 is better than the GeForce MX110.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons