AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 M265 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M 1 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

176 points
58% significantly better overall score
111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
3 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS
Identical
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 M265 and the Quadro K610M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6785 points
270% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
1833 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6701 points
258% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
1867 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6539 points
227% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
1997 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

5824 points
211% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
1867 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

725 MHz
980 MHz
35% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
300% significantly more memory
1 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

32 GB/s
53% significantly higher memory bandwidth
20.8 GB/s

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.84 Gigapixels/s
100% significantly higher pixel rate
3.92 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.52 Gigatexels/s
49% significantly higher texture rate
15.68 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384
100% significantly more shading units
192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

24
49% significantly more texture mapping units
16

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

8
Identical
8

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

451st of 586
498th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.2
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3
4.5

Radeon R7 M265 vs Quadro K610M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R7 M265 GPU is faster than the Quadro K610M in gaming.

The Quadro K610M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Radeon R7 M265 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 1 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R7 M265 is better than the Quadro K610M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons