AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M 1 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

176 points
58% significantly better overall score
111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
3 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS
Identical
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 M260X and the Quadro K610M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5979 points
226% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
1833 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5787 points
189% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
1997 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4631 points
148% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
1867 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

620 MHz
980 MHz
58% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
300% significantly more memory
1 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s
207% significantly higher memory bandwidth
20.8 GB/s

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.72 Gigapixels/s
45% significantly higher pixel rate
3.92 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

17.16 Gigatexels/s
9% slightly higher texture rate
15.68 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384
100% significantly more shading units
192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

24
49% significantly more texture mapping units
16

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

8
Identical
8

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

448th of 586
491st of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.2
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3
4.5

Radeon R7 M260X vs Quadro K610M comparison

For gaming, the Radeon R7 M260X graphics card is better than the Quadro K610M in our tests.

The Quadro K610M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Radeon R7 M260X has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 1 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Radeon R7 M260X is faster than the Quadro K610M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons