AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

176 points

250 points

42% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

6 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

3 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 M260X and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5979 points

46% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5787 points

42% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4631 points

12% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4126 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

620 MHz

954 MHz

53% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

Identical

64 GB/s

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.72 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

33% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

17.16 Gigatexels/s

30.53 Gigatexels/s

77% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

447th of 586

400th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.2

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Radeon R7 M260X vs Quadro K2000 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K2000 GPU is faster than the Radeon R7 M260X in gaming.

The Quadro K2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Radeon R7 M260X has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K2000 over the Radeon R7 M260X.