AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

176 points

5% slightly better overall score

167 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 M260X and the Quadro 2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5979 points

113% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2794 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5787 points

68% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3434 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

620 MHz

12% slightly higher core clock speed

550 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

122% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.72 Gigapixels/s

30% slightly higher pixel rate

4.4 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

17.16 Gigatexels/s

17.6 Gigatexels/s

2% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

100% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

448th of 586

453rd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.2

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Radeon R7 M260X vs Quadro 2000M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R7 M260X beats the Quadro 2000M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon R7 M260X has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Radeon R7 M260X has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R7 M260X is better than the Quadro 2000M.