AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

232 points

260 points

12% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

6 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 M260 and the Quadro K2000D? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5767 points

60% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3602 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5130 points

31% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3916 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

940 MHz

954 MHz

1% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

32 GB/s

64 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.84 Gigapixels/s

2% slightly higher pixel rate

7.63 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.52 Gigatexels/s

30.53 Gigatexels/s

29% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

406th of 586

396th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.2

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Radeon R7 M260 vs Quadro K2000D comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K2000D GPU is faster than the Radeon R7 M260 in gaming.

The Quadro K2000D has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Radeon R7 M260 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K2000D is better than the Radeon R7 M260.