AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Compare AMD Radeon R7 260X 2 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

779 points

78% significantly better overall score

436 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

19 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

10 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

6 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 260X and the Radeon Pro WX 2100? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1100 MHz

18% slightly higher core clock speed

925 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz

1219 MHz

21% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

104 GB/s

116% significantly higher memory bandwidth

48 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

115 W

35 W

228% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.6 Gigapixels/s

19.5 Gigapixels/s

10% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

61.6 Gigatexels/s

57% significantly higher texture rate

39.01 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.97 TFLOPS

57% significantly better floating point performance

1.25 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

75% significantly more shading units

512

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

283rd of 586

346th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.6

Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R7 260X beats the Radeon Pro WX 2100 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Radeon R7 260X has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Radeon R7 260X at 115 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R7 260X is better than the Radeon Pro WX 2100.