AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 260X 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

779 points

55% significantly better overall score

501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

19 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

9 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

8 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 260X and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1100 MHz

6% slightly higher core clock speed

1029 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz

1098 MHz

9% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

104 GB/s

29% slightly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

115 W

55 W

109% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.6 Gigapixels/s

0.17% slightly higher pixel rate

17.57 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

61.6 Gigatexels/s

40% slightly higher texture rate

43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

40% slightly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

283rd of 586

328th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Radeon R7 260X vs Quadro M2000M comparison

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R7 260X beats the Quadro M2000M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Radeon R7 260X has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Quadro M2000M has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro M2000M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Radeon R7 260X at 115 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R7 260X over the Quadro M2000M.