AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 240 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 125.00

$ 88.11

$ 36.89 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

121 points

167 points

38% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

3 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

Identical

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 240 and the Quadro 2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5326 points

90% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2794 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5101 points

48% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3434 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

730 MHz

32% slightly higher core clock speed

550 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

72 GB/s

150% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

30 W

83% significantly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.24 Gigapixels/s

41% slightly higher pixel rate

4.4 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

15.6 Gigatexels/s

17.6 Gigatexels/s

12% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

66% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

60% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

484th of 586

452nd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Radeon R7 240 vs Quadro 2000M comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro 2000M beats the Radeon R7 240 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon R7 240 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Radeon R7 240 has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Quadro 2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro 2000M is faster than the Radeon R7 240.