AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare AMD Radeon R5 M335 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

158 points

278 points

75% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

169 FPS

163 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

3 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R5 M335 and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5143 points

46% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3517 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

5131 points

10% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4645 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5009 points

6238 points

24% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4727 points

39% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1070 MHz

57% significantly higher core clock speed

680 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

14.4 GB/s

102.4 GB/s

611% significantly higher memory bandwidth

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

8.56 Gigapixels/s

11.3 Gigapixels/s

32% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

21.4 Gigatexels/s

45.18 Gigatexels/s

111% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

768

139% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

220% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

463rd of 586

389th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R5 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 October

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Radeon R5 M335 vs Quadro K3100M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R5 M335 beats the Quadro K3100M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon R5 M335 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Radeon R5 M335 is faster than the Quadro K3100M.