AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R5 M330 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

10% slightly better overall score

167 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

2 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R5 M330 and the Quadro 2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5430 points

94% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2794 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5844 points

70% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3434 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

955 MHz

73% significantly higher core clock speed

550 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

14.4 GB/s

28.8 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

18 W

205% significantly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

8.24 Gigapixels/s

87% significantly higher pixel rate

4.4 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

20.6 Gigatexels/s

17% slightly higher texture rate

17.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

66% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

60% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

443rd of 586

460th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R5 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Radeon R5 M330 vs Quadro 2000M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R5 M330 GPU is faster than the Quadro 2000M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Radeon R5 M330 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Radeon R5 M330 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Radeon R5 M330 has a significantly lower TDP at 18 W when compared to the Quadro 2000M at 55 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R5 M330 over the Quadro 2000M.