AMD Radeon R5 340 vs AMD FirePro W2100

Compare AMD Radeon R5 340 vs AMD FirePro W2100, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

241 points
99% significantly better overall score
121 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
3 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
0 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R5 340 and the FirePro W2100? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5498 points
24% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
4425 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5434 points
33% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
4070 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4578 points
1% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
4497 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

730 MHz
15% slightly higher core clock speed
630 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

780 MHz
14% slightly higher boost clock speed
680 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit
128 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

36.8 GB/s
27% slightly higher memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

65 W
26 W
150% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.24 Gigapixels/s
14% slightly higher pixel rate
5.44 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

18.72 Gigatexels/s
37% slightly higher texture rate
13.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384
20% slightly more shading units
320

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

24
20% slightly more texture mapping units
20

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

8
Identical
8

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

403rd of 586
483rd of 586

Family

The product line

-
FirePro

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 May
2014 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

Radeon R5 340 vs FirePro W2100 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R5 340 beats the FirePro W2100 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Radeon R5 340 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Radeon R5 340 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the FirePro W2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 26 W when compared to the Radeon R5 340 at 65 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R5 340 over the FirePro W2100.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons