AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA T400 4GB

Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 4 GB vs NVIDIA T400 4GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 119.99
$ 56.00 significantly less expensive
$ 175.99

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

445 points
844 points
89% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

11 FPS
22 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

7 FPS
11 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS
14 FPS
5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

4 FPS
8 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon Pro WX 3200 and the T400 4GB? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

15640 points
16489 points
5% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

14637 points
17184 points
17% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

15582 points
16244 points
4% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1295 MHz
208% significantly higher core clock speed
420 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

96 GB/s
20% slightly higher memory bandwidth
80 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

65 W
30 W
116% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

20.72 Gigapixels/s
22.8 Gigapixels/s
10% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

41.44 Gigatexels/s
21% slightly higher texture rate
34.2 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640
66% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

32
33% slightly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

341st of 586
273rd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 July
2021 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs T400 4GB benchmarks

For gaming, the T400 4GB graphics card is better than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in our tests.

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the T400 4GB has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Radeon Pro WX 3200 at 65 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the T400 4GB is faster than the Radeon Pro WX 3200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons