AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA T600

Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA T600, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA T600

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 82.02

$ 194.98 significantly less expensive

$ 277.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

436 points

1344 points

208% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS

33 FPS

23 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

17 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS

22 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

13 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and the T600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11128 points

27240 points

144% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10972 points

25594 points

133% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10310 points

27576 points

167% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12066 points

25658 points

112% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

925 MHz

25% slightly higher core clock speed

735 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1219 MHz

1335 MHz

9% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48 GB/s

160 GB/s

233% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

14% slightly lower TDP

40 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.5 Gigapixels/s

42.72 Gigapixels/s

119% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

39.01 Gigatexels/s

53.4 Gigatexels/s

36% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.25 TFLOPS

1.71 TFLOPS

36% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512

640

25% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

346th of 586

240th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 June

2021 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs T600 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the T600 beats the Radeon Pro WX 2100 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the T600 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the T600 at 40 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the T600 over the Radeon Pro WX 2100.