AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 82.02

$ 70.99

$ 11.03 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

436 points

42% slightly better overall score

306 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and the Quadro K620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11128 points

62% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

6869 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10972 points

67% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

6567 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10310 points

53% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6697 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12066 points

105% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

5877 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

925 MHz

1000 MHz

8% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1219 MHz

8% slightly higher boost clock speed

1124 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48 GB/s

66% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

28% slightly lower TDP

45 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.5 Gigapixels/s

8% slightly higher pixel rate

17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

39.01 Gigatexels/s

44% significantly higher texture rate

26.98 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512

33% slightly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

346th of 586

376th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 June

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Quadro K620 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K620 beats the Radeon Pro WX 2100 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro K620 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K620 at 45 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K620 over the Radeon Pro WX 2100.