AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 82.02

$ 67.44 significantly less expensive

$ 149.46

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

436 points

899 points

106% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS

20 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

13 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS

14 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

10 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and the Quadro K4200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11128 points

11745 points

5% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10972 points

11396 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10310 points

12321 points

19% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12066 points

12444 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

925 MHz

18% slightly higher core clock speed

780 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1219 MHz

55% significantly higher boost clock speed

784 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48 GB/s

172.8 GB/s

259% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

200% significantly lower TDP

105 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.5 Gigapixels/s

21.95 Gigapixels/s

12% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

39.01 Gigatexels/s

87.81 Gigatexels/s

125% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.25 TFLOPS

2.11 TFLOPS

68% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512

1344

162% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

250% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

347th of 586

271st of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 June

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Quadro K4200 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K4200 beats the Radeon Pro WX 2100 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K4200 at 105 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K4200 is better than the Radeon Pro WX 2100.