AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 82.02
$ 767.97 significantly less expensive
$ 849.99

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

436 points
56% significantly better overall score
278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and the Quadro K2100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11128 points
251% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
3163 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10972 points
201% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
3644 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10310 points
122% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
4627 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12066 points
177% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
4355 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

925 MHz
41% slightly higher core clock speed
654 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit
128 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48 GB/s
48.13 GB/s
0.27% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W
57% significantly lower TDP
55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.5 Gigapixels/s
143% significantly higher pixel rate
8.00 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

39.01 Gigatexels/s
21% slightly higher texture rate
32.02 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512
576
12% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

32
48
49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

347th of 586
387th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 June
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Quadro K2100M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 beats the Quadro K2100M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K2100M at 55 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon Pro WX 2100 over the Quadro K2100M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons