AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 82.02

$ 54.94 significantly less expensive

$ 136.96

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

436 points

74% significantly better overall score

250 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11128 points

173% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10972 points

195% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3710 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10310 points

153% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12066 points

192% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4126 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

925 MHz

954 MHz

3% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48 GB/s

64 GB/s

33% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

45% significantly lower TDP

51 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

19.5 Gigapixels/s

155% significantly higher pixel rate

7.63 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

39.01 Gigatexels/s

27% slightly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512

33% slightly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

347th of 586

400th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 June

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 beats the Quadro K2000 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K2000 at 51 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 is better than the Quadro K2000.